
Eric Laine, DJ, Videographer, Fayerweather Gallery, University of Virginia, 2000
Exhibition Aqua, an Auto-Tonic Reverberations production, Opening night
This series of four panels you call A Love Supreme deals with repetition, change of depth and perspective and seems to mark a narrative progression, what is your perspective on multiples?
Frank Stella once tried to explain that he wanted to make the most important painting possible with relation to his time period within art history. He compared his making the black paintings with the painting of Velasquez, and he may as well have been painting panels for how specifically one was related to another. He seems to have really gone the distance on observing the physical boundaries of paintings, not necessarily "painting" but "paintings," looking at them the same way he is aware of architecture. (Which is one of the most important lessons in art history, I think, and leads to an awareness of scale and installation.) Although Stella claimed to discount any metaphorical interpretations of his black paintings, they inevitably relate to the sublime. Rothko and painters of the sublime offer a tangible construction of the infinite, the unknown, thus an udience is left with nothing but the work and themselves and most likely they have trouble relating themselves specifically to a suspended color field varying between yellow and orange. I want to force the issue of a personal agenda which all have had some kind of opinion about. This is what brings me to a representational vehicle.
What do you mean by representational vehicle, because many of your paintings are completely abstract.
When taken out of the group context, the series, they are abstract. But within the representational vehicle of marine imagery or television images of the earth they stand with an aggressive relation to the viewer. The concept must drive the craft.
So then you are talking more about the conceptual; titles, history, etc.
Well, not completely, I think the representational vehicle is still functional within the paintings without the titles and any of this, what is being recorded here. As a series, the paintings can stand together and their representational pieces can locate the viewer relatively specifically. Some are even specifically created through a process based on the spontaneous images that arise out of repetitive sensual expression of painting.
Explain this a bit more.
It is a process that mimics the natural optical phenomena we go through everyday, when focusing on distant horizons or out-of-focus objects, when a crumpled piece of newspaper rattling in the corner of where a building meets the sidewalk you're walking on alarms you as possibly a live raccoon... but during the day? Could be rabid, abandoned, lost. But then you see as you approach: just a New York Times. I like to paint the raccoon, but usually it comes out as a New York Times and I think both are less powerful isolated.